Back

Who we are

With research staff from more than 60 countries, and offices across the globe, IFPRI provides research-based policy solutions to sustainably reduce poverty and end hunger and malnutrition in developing countries.

Kalyani Raghunathan

Kalyani Raghunathan is Research Fellow in the Poverty, Gender, and Inclusion Unit, based in New Delhi, India. Her research lies at the intersection of agriculture, gender, social protection, and public health and nutrition, with a specific focus on South Asia and Africa. 

Where we work

Back

Where we work

IFPRI currently has more than 600 employees working in over 80 countries with a wide range of local, national, and international partners.

Giving and taking between husband, wives, and co-wives

Open Access | CC-BY-4.0

polygamy_map

Over 40% of women in many West African countries are in polygynous marriages—the practice of having more than one wife. This has created a challenge for development programs that wish to help all family members equally, especially children.

Polygynous husbands and wives cooperate less than monogamous ones and may contribute resources to the household with less altruistic motives, according to a paper in the April issue of the American Economic Journal: Applied Economics.

Authors Abigail Barr, Marleen Dekker, Wendy Janssens, Bereket Kebede, and IFPRI’s Berber Kramer conducted an experiment in Nigeria with 448 individuals who were in either monogamous marriages or polygynous marriages involving two wives.

In the experiment, each person received an endowment of money, typically equal to one-third of the median daily income. Participants were then asked how much of the endowment they would like to contribute to an account shared with one other participant. The shared account was then increased by 50% and split evenly between the two. Participants kept for themselves whatever they didn’t contribute.

Monogamous individuals did this once with their spouse and twice with people from other households. Polygynous husbands did this once with each wife and once with someone outside of his household. Polygynous wives did this once with their husband, once with their co-wife, and once with someone from a different household.

The researchers found that when people from the same household cooperated, monogamous spouses contributed on average 88% of their initial endowment to the shared fund, while polygynous spouses contributed 78%.

Source: Barr et al. (2019)

Figure 2 from their paper breaks down the average contribution rate of each spouse within both types of households. The blue Mars symbol represents a husband, the pink Venus symbol a wife. Arrows emanating from one symbol pointing to another indicate the average contribution rate from one spouse to another. For example, husbands in polygynous marriages contributed 80% with one wife and 78% with the other on average.

The chart shows that husbands and wives in monogamous marriages contributed at about the same rate, 89% and 87% respectively. Polygynous husbands and wives however contributed at a lower rate of roughly 80%. Co-wives contributed to each other’s shared fund at an even lower rate, 76%.

In addition, conduct was less altruistic and more quid-pro-quo within polygynous households. But when cooperating with people from different households, conduct was the same for polygynous and monogamous individuals. Further study will be needed to undercover why marriage arrangements affect how households cooperate.

This post first appeared on the American Economic Association website.

Countries


Topics


Donors

No donors listed

Previous Blog Posts