In several respects, the first decade of the 21st century was a golden opportunity for the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC): The death of Laurent-Désiré Kabila created a critical juncture, both internally and externally, during which everyone realized that a further implosion of the DRC should be prevented at all costs. Peace, democracy, and poverty reduction were the three main ingredients of post-conflict reconstruction. In this blog post, we focus on the third ingredient.
The macroeconomic indicators required for sustained poverty reduction were certainly encouraging. Not only did the public budget multiply tenfold between 2002 and 2012, a successfully elaborated poverty reduction strategy was eventually rewarded with irrevocable debt relief in 2010 of around $12.3 billion. These efforts also resulted in unprecedented GDP growth: Negative growth rates turned positive in less than five years, from –7% in 2000 to almost +7% in 2004, and remained high until 2015, with the exception of 2009, the year after the global financial crisis. Accounting for population growth, estimated at 3%, per capita GDP still increased on average by 3-4% on an annual basis. In a broader perspective, the growth percentages observed over the 2004-2013 decade are unprecedented in post-independence DRC.
Diverging voices, deficient data
But did the observed unprecedented GDP growth also translate into poverty reduction? Expert opinions are divided on this point. Those close to the DRC government, as well as IMF experts, are predictably optimistic. At the moment of granting debt relief to the DRC, the IMF referred to a “satisfactory implementation of the country’s poverty reduction and growth strategy, maintenance of macroeconomic stability, improvements in public expenditure and debt management, and improved governance and service delivery in key social sectors such as health, education and rural development.” In contrast, Pierre Englebert voiced a popular opinion that “Congo’s sizzling rate of economic growth has so far not had much of an impact on the welfare of its citizens, particularly the poorest ones.”
In a recent paper, we answered this crucial question by taking another look at two national household surveys conducted, respectively, in 2004-05, right before the 2006 elections that inaugurated the first post-conflict government, and in 2012-13, about 7 years after the first round. On the basis of this data, both the Institut National de la Statistique (INS) of the DRC in 2014 and the World Bank concluded that there had been a significant decrease in poverty between the two survey periods. Using the same datasets, both institutions found that the poverty headcount decreased by 5 to 8 percentage points (see Table below).
However, one problem with both estimates is that they cannot be replicated: the World Bank reports its poverty estimates without elaborating on the methodology, nor explaining why they differ from the INS results. Although INS provides more details on its methodology, we could only replicate the 2005 poverty estimates, but not its 2012 estimates.
Wim Marivoet, Tom De Herdt and John Ulimwengu (2019): Reviewing DRC’s poverty estimates, 2005-12.
Both the original datasets and our reworked dataset can be downloaded at this website.
Moreover, when we applied the methodology used by INS in 2005 to the 2012 survey, we found that the percentage of people in poverty substantially increased from 72% to 81% . This is not only in sharp contrast to the INS own reported results, it also runs counter to what we know about the macroeconomic trend of the DRC economy.
Improving existing poverty methodologies
To produce more accurate poverty estimates and trends, we reviewed the INS methodology and recommended a few modifications. More specifically, while the INS did not apply a consistent methodology to define a representative sample for the two survey periods, we proposed a way to correct for this. Second, we proposed a coherent way to deal with differences between house renters and house owners. Further, we proposed a coherent method for calculating poverty lines and we use these poverty lines also to account for differences in price levels between the major cities and between different rural regions. Finally, we correct for errors in reporting food consumption.
While implementing the above recommendations, we found that it was especially important to correct for the high degree of market fragmentation that profoundly characterizes the DRC economy. In itself, this fragmentation results from the combined effect of (1) differences in dietary and consumption practices, (2) regional differences in productive capacity, (3) differential access to international markets and (4) notoriously weak communication and transport infrastructure. Usual poverty line methodologies typically deal with these inter-regional differences by distinguishing between urban and rural areas, but in the case of the DRC this captures only one-third to less than half of the variety in cost-of-living differences measured through the method we propose.
No change in poverty
Based on the revised methodology and in line with both INS and World Bank estimates, our findings suggest that two-thirds of the DRC population are poor. This is concerning, especially given that the measure of poverty adopted essentially pegs poverty to insufficient food intake. In other words, more or less two thirds of the people in the DRC are undernourished.
Moreover, contrary to both INS and World Bank estimates, we found that the percentage of people in poverty in general did not significantly change between 2005 and 2012. In other words, the decade of unprecedented economic growth did not visibly translate into increased consumption for the bottom two-thirds of the population. In fact, comparing the official approach and the one proposed in this blog post, we found consistent evidence in terms of poverty rates only for the provinces of Bas-Congo and Katanga. In all other regions, we found that the direction of poverty and its magnitude are different across methodologies.
It is worth noting that there are important regional differences. In cities and towns, poverty did decrease, whereas it increased in the countryside. The positive trend observed in urban areas is mainly driven by the capital city of Kinshasa where poverty decreased spectacularly (-18 percentage points), which was due to a significant increase in overall income across all social groups. However, Kinshasa stands out as an exception; for the rest of the country, there is very little evidence of trickle down of per capita GDP growth. This result is consistent with evidence on ‘kinocentrisme’ (a systematic bias to favour the capital city) and with analyses that point to a disproportionate weight of Congo’s mining sector within the political economy of reconstruction.
Our findings also point to an urgent need to make both international and national statistical services more transparent and available to the wider public. Increased public scrutiny will surely increase the quality and credibility of official poverty estimates.
Wim Marivoet is a Research Fellow with IFPRI’s West Central Africa Office in Dakar, Senegal. Tom De Herdt is Professor at the University of Antwerp’s Institute of Development. John Ulimwengu is an IFPRI Senior Research Fellow based in Washington. This post first appeared on the Review of African Political Economy.
